National Public Radio publishes a lot of things that are, to say the least, not worthwhile; the “The End of Privacy” is not one of them. Please read the following introductory piece by Julian Sanchez of Cato@Liberty, then go on over to NPR and see the comprehensive introduction to the bitter fruits of the currently unavoidable loss of privacy that the digital age is ushering in. The question that begs for an answer is not whether the digital age is good or bad: it is good. The question is how we will cope with the bitter fruits that it bears along with the sweet. Yours truly

‘The End of Privacy’ and the Surveillance-Industrial Complex

Posted by Julian Sanchez

National Public Radio’s All Things Considered ran a series on “The End of Privacy” all last week that’s worth a listen. They’re primarily concerned with the ways private companies have access to vast quantities of information about individuals in the digital age—something that civil libertarians have traditionally been less concerned about than government access, for many perfectly valid reasons.  But it’s worth noting how porous that distinction can be.  A 2006 survey by the Government Accountability Office found that just four government agencies—the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, State Department, and Social Security Administration—spent at least $30 million annually on contracts with information resellers like Choicepoint. The vast majority of that data (91%) was used for law enforcement or counterterror purposes.  And GAO found that the resellers weren’t always in full compliance with the privacy practices that the agencies themselves are supposed to follow.

Choicepoint, coincidentally, is one of the largest clients of the consulting firm run by former Attorney General John Ashcroft. Little wonder given the amount of cash at stake: As reporter Tim Shorrock has documented, some 70 percent of our vast intelligence budget is channeled through private-sector contractors, which means that we need to understand government surveillance policy in the context of a “surveillance-industrial complex” that parallels the more familiar military-industrial complex known for bringing us $600 toilet seats and other forms of pork in camo gear. It’s worth bearing in mind that it’s not just investigatory zeal and public fear driving the expansion of the surveillance state—a lot of people are making a lot of money off it as well.

Julian Sanchez • November 2, 2009 @ 2:24 pm
Filed under: Law and Civil Liberties; Telecom, Internet & Information Policy
Tags: civil libertarians, department of homeland security, government accountability office, government surveillance, intelligence budget, john ashcroft, military industrial complex, national public radio, private sector contractors, surveillance state, tim shorrock

Source: Cato@Liberty

Related articles by Zemanta

• Presidents Will Never Give Up Power (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
• Patriot Act Provisions Get Obama Support (abcnews.go.com)
• Obama Administration: Toss Wiretap Lawsuit (abcnews.go.com)
• Scan Finds 21,000 Vulnerable Internet Devices (wired.com)
• New Hybrid Military-State Dept. Agency Proposed: Blessing or Boondoggle? (seminal.firedoglake.com)
• Zazi dans le WaPo: DOJ Feeds Press Still More Justifications for PATRIOT (emptywheel.firedoglake.com)
• Ashcroft on Waterboarding Prosecutions (emptywheel.firedoglake.com)
• Court: Ashcroft Can Be Sued in 9/11 Cases (abcnews.go.com)

The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age

No related posts.

Tagged as: Attorney general, Business, civil libertarians, civil liberties, department of homeland security, Government Accountability Office, government surveillance, Human Rights and Liberties, Information Age, intelligence budget, John Ashcroft, military industrial complex, My Personal Introspections, National Public Radio, Privacy, private sector contractors, Protocols, Security, Social Security Administration, surveillance state, tim shorrock, United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice