An inscrutable phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer”; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.  He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as legislator.

And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor.  It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.

Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass — held to a lower standard — because of the color of his skin.  Podhoretz continues:

And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon — affirmative action.  Not in the legal sense, of course.  But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back.  Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.  Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action.  Yes, racist.  Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin — that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.  And that is what America did to Obama.

True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be?  As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate.  All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.  What could this breed if not the sort of empty  narcissism on display every time Obama speaks?

In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character.  Those people — conservatives included — ought now to be deeply embarrassed.  The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that’s when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.  Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth — it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character?  Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles.  Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess.  It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.  But really, what were we to expect?  The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job.  When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense.  It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

But hey, at least we got to feel good about ourselves for a little while.  And really, isn’t that all that matters these days?

See also: The Era of Confronting Obama at Public Events

Update:

Author’s Note.  A lot of readers have written in asking me how I came to the conclusion that Obama was an unremarkable student and that he benefited from affirmative action.  Three reasons:

1)  As reported by The New York Sun: ”A spokesman for the university, Brian Connolly, confirmed that Mr. Obama spent two years at Columbia College and graduated in 1983 with a major in political science. He did not receive honors…”  In spite of not receiving honors as an undergrad, Obama was nevertheless admitted to Harvard Law.  Why?

2)  Obama himself has written he was a poor student as a young man.  As the Baltimore Sun reported, in:

“‘Obama’s book ‘Dreams from My Father,’….the president recalled a time in his life…when he started to drift away from the path of success. ’I had learned not to care,’ Obama wrote. ‘… Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it.’ But his mother confronted him about his behavior. ’Don’t you think you’re being a little casual about your future?” she asked him, according to the book. ‘… One of your friends was just arrested for drug possession. Your grades are slipping. You haven’t even started on your college applications.’”

3)  Most damning to me is the president’s unwillingness to make his transcripts public.  If Obama had really been a stellar student with impeccable grades as an undergrad, is there any doubt they would have been made public by now and trumpeted on the front page of the New York Times as proof of his brilliance?  To me it all adds up to affirmative action.

Mattpattersonline.com
Source: American Thinker

Related posts:

1. Obama: star and idol of the far left
2. Rush Limbaugh: Thank You Mr. President
3. Will Obama Dismantle America Before She Wakes Up?

Members of Congress Are the Bandits; “We the People” Are the Fools

Did you miss the horrendous story 60 Minutes broke last Sunday. If you missed it, it will be well worth your time to see  it here and now. The story shows that some members of Congress, including House leadership on both sides of the isle, are apparently engaging in insider trading. Said another way, the members of Congress are making out like bandits and “we the people” are the suckers they are stealing from by their insider trading. Insider trading by you and me would land us in prison for a long time, but it is merely another perk for members of Congress.

Kudos to CBS for this story

I know CBS NEWS has not been known for doing much hard news in the past, except for stories that cast conservatism and conservatives in a bad light, but they claim that is changing, and I, for one, am inclined to take them at their word until they prove otherwise. This video is an example of hard news that take no prisoners on the progressive or the conservative sides of the political spectrum. Kudos to the CBS show 60 Minutes for this story.

This 60 Minutes story was probably sparked by a book that touches on this subject. The book is Throw Them All Out by Peter Schweizer. Click the book title Throw Them All Out and get your own copy. The cost at the time of this writing was $15.60. (Fair warning, I will make a  shekel of two if you buy using this link to Throw Them All Out.)

Book Description:

One of the biggest scandals in American politics is waiting to explode: the full story of the inside game in Washington shows how the permanent political class enriches itself at the expense of the rest of us. Insider trading is illegal on Wall Street, yet it is routine among members of Congress. Normal individuals cannot get in on IPOs at the initial asking price, but politicians can and do routinely. The Obama administration has been able to funnel hundreds of millions of dollars to its supporters, ensuring yet more campaign donations. An entire class of investors now makes all of its profits based on influence and access in Washington. Peter Schweizer has doggedly researched through mountains of financial records, tracking complicated deals and stock trades back to the timing of briefings, votes on bills, and every other point of leverage for politicians in Washington. The result is a manifesto for revolution: the Permanent Political Class must go.

We must stamp this kind of behavior. This book will provoke you and all freedom-loving Americans.

If You Haven’t Seen This Video Yet, You Need to See It Now

If you haven’t seen it yet, see it here and now. You may want to download the transcription of the show on the CBS News website here instead to read later or to read along as you watch the video.

CBS NEWS VIDEO

Should “We the People” Throw Them All Out?

There is a reason that no one should be able to use non-public information to make money with stock transactions: Such a practice creates an unlevel playing field and strips markets of credibility and fairness. There is an even better reason members of Congress should not be allowed to do so: It interferes with their ability to do their job, which is presumably to represent “we the people,” rather than represent their own selfish interests.

You would expect this sort of self-dealing from people like a Muammar Gaddafi, not members of the U.S. Congress. What makes it even worse is that this is a problem that is simple to solve. Members of Congress should do what the President does – have their assets in blind trusts so they have no ability to influence the investments they own. I hasten to add such a blind trust should be monitored by regulators to see to it that it does not engage in financial shenanigans for the benefit of its Congressional owner. Commonsense and Christian morality dictates this course of action. But since commonsense Christian morality obviously don’t work for many in the U.S. Congress, I suppose yet another law would be in order.

What do you think? Should trading on inside information be just another Congressional perk? Or do you see it my way; as common criminal activity that should be severely punished. Share your view here.

Related articles

• “Honest Graft” – How Our Representatives enrich themselves through Congressional Insider Trading (theleagueofaggressiveprogressives.wordpress.com)
• Your Take: Congressional Insider Trading (bargaineering.com)
• Connecticut Doctor Gets 5 Years Prison for Insider Trading and Over $10 Million in Fines – You Have To Be A Member of Congress To Pull Something Like This Off… (ducknetweb.blogspot.com)
• OUTRAGE OF THE MONTH: Insider Trading In Congress (businessinsider.com)

Related posts:

1. Congress Took a Sharp Turn to the Right Today

The War on Terror Is a War America Must Win

My two cents worth

As the anniversary of 9/11 approaches it is appropriate that “America’s War on Terror” is the subject of the latest Hillsdale College First Principles on First Fridays free webcast. No caring, patriotic American should allow this free webcast lecture, or any of others in this series, to pass them by, if at all possible.  Your fellow American patriots hope you will attend.

Now here follows your invitation from Hillsdale College:

Join Us on Friday, September 9, for Another Free Webcast!

HillsdaleFirstFridays.com

Hillsdale College’s Allan P. Kirby, Jr. Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship will offer a FREE, live webcast of its next “First Principles on First Fridays” lecture.

“America’s War on Terror”

Lt. Gen. Ronald L. Burgess, Jr.

Director, Defense Intelligence Agency

Friday, September 9, 2011 · 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM EDT

Register Today!

About the Lecture

A decade after September 11, 2001, what have we learned and what changes have we made within the intelligence community to strengthen the nation’s defense intelligence efforts? With attention to the role intelligence has played in the global conflict, this presentation will salute those who help keep our country safe.

Lieutenant General Ronald L. Burgess, Jr., is Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and Commander of the Joint Functional Component Command. In a career spanning nearly 40 years, he has received numerous awards and decorations, including the Defense Distinguished Service Medal, the Defense Superior Service Medal, the Legion of Merit, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Joint Service Commendation Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal, and the NATO Medal. Commissioned in Military Intelligence through the Auburn University ROTC Program, he earned a Master of Science degree in Education from the University of Southern California and a Master of Military Arts and Science from the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.

Funding for this month’s First Principles on First Fridays program has been provided by Mrs. Walter R. Buerger.

About the First Principles Series

This monthly lecture series, launched in December 2008, addresses significant and timely political, historical, and economic topics from a constitutional perspective. Past speakers have included David Horowitz, Brian Kennedy, Paul Rahe, John Bolton, Thomas G. West, and Larry P. Arnn.  A video archive of past First Principles lectures is available here.

Related posts:

1. Free Six-Week U.S. Constitution Course offered by Hillsdale College Starting September 15th
2. Free Offer: Hillsdale College Constitution Course
3. To Lose a War

Register today for the Constitution Day Celebration and “Introduction to the Constitution” webcast series!

This six-week introductory course on the U.S. Constitution is really a six-day (make that evening, if you prefer) course delivered over a period of six weeks. Not to worry, you will not be inundated with information for hours on end each of those six days. People who, for the most part are not still in school somewhere, cannot be expected to absorb too much. That is the reason this is called an “Introduction to the Constitution.” The first night will primarily be devoted to remarks by Charles Krauthammer and Congressman Paul Ryan; both of whom know something about the U.S. Constitution. The five following lectures will be delivered by Dr. Larry Arnn, and I can promise you that you will not be bored by his lectures. He is a well-known (in conservative circles, as least), excellent lecturer who knows his subject as well as anyone you will ever hear or meet.

Now, click one of these hillsdale.edu links and give yourself six interesting and worthwhile evening lectures by some easy-on-the-ears-and-posterior speakers.

Constitution.hillsdale.edu

On September 15, in observance and celebration of Constitution Day, Hillsdale College will hold our second annual Constitution Day Celebration, this year featuring Congressman Paul Ryan, syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer, members of the Hillsdale College faculty, and other distinguished guests.  Once you register for this event – it’s free – you’ll be able to watch all of these speeches and panels live from your home or office. Even if you are unable to watch on the day of the event, we will make all of the videos available to view in the weeks following.

Register for FREE now: constitution.hillsdale.edu

Then, for the next five weeks after our Constitution Day Celebration, we invite you back to this site for a special series of lectures, delivered by Hillsdale College President Dr. Larry Arnn, called the “Introduction to the Constitution.” Included in what we will discuss is:

* What the framers of the Constitution understood about the document they were writing, especially its fundamental principles true of human beings at all times and in all places;
* Why the fundamental features of the American Constitution are representation and separation of powers;
* Why the key to a republican form of government is the vibrancy, size and independence of this private society.
This program will serve as the basis for future educational programs on Constitution and related topics, including a more complete Online Constitution Class, of which this series will serve as a basis. We will be asking for your participation and feedback along the way to help us improve our efforts.

Register for “Introduction to the Constitution”

Please share this information with others – your friends, family, and colleagues who, like you, understand the vital need for restoring an understanding and love of the Constitution in our great nation.

Visit our website, www.hillsdale.edu, for more information about Hillsdale College.

Related articles

• The Relevancy of The Constitution (loopyloo305.wordpress.com)
• Socialists Plan to Rage Against Freedom on Constitution Day (dakotavoice.com)
• Cooling Off with Warm Fellowship in Hillsdale (winckles.typepad.com)

Related posts:

1. Free Offer: Hillsdale College Constitution Course

“The religion that the Prophet Muhammad preached provided his followers an ethical and moral vision for leading a life of righteousness?” Perry/Khan curriculum.

The follow article will makes a person wonder. This article, which appeared on the Big Government blog,  caught my eye regarding one of my favorites in the 2012 presidential sweepstakes:

All traces of Perry/Aga Khan curriculum removed from web

In this post I [the author, not yours truly] included numerous links to the Rick Perry/Aga Khan Islamic curriculum for Texas public schools. The links were to the Google cache of the curriculum material, because several days ago, after we began calling attention to it, the curriculum was taken offline. Accordingly I wrote in that post:

One very odd thing about the Aga Khan/Perry curriculum: since this whole brouhaha started, it has been taken offline. It is now available only in cached form here. Why was it taken down? Was the Perry camp embarrassed by the material that Pamela Geller published here, showing it to be a whitewash of Islamic teaching and history? Or was it taken down because it really is, as Ace says, so “biased against Muslims it will reinforce perceptions [Perry] is some kind of rootin’-tootin’ six-gun shooting cowboy yahoo”?

Is either option favorable to Perry? If it was taken down because it’s a dhimmi whitewash, Perry is tacitly admitting that our criticisms of him were right, and those evaluating Perry should be concerned about his naivete in dealing with the Aga Khan. If it was taken down because it was too honest about Islam and will thus hurt Perry with the dhimmi/Norquist faction of the GOP, Perry is again tacitly admitting that our criticisms of him were right: he is not able or willing to stand up to Norquist and his Islamic supremacist allies. So which is it? What are they hiding? And does it matter? Either way, the deep-sixing of the curriculum proves that we were right about Perry all along.

Continue reading this Big Government blog article here.…

Does Rick Perry Deserves a Closer Look

I hope you will continue reading the rest of  this article. Look, if you are like me, you have liked what you have seen and heard of Rick Perry so far. But, I thought from the beginning that unless we want another hidden pig-in-a-poke taking the whelm of the presidency, we need to look behind the scenes of the always less than incisive reporting of the news media, including my favorite Fox News, and decide for ourselves which of the  presidential candidates best fills our bill of particulars for the next president of the United States.  Having said that, these charges merit close scrutiny and the links in this story will give you some guidance for doing that very thing.

Rick Perry is my pick

Despite all the hoopla being raised about his fitness as a conservative hopeful, Rick Perry remains my pick of those currently in the running or trying to be in the running.

Prospective presidential candidates are put through a grueling marathon to test their resolve and fitness

People seeking to be the presidential candidate of the political party out of power are put through a grueling year or two long marathon race, that tests their resolve and fitness for the office. This marathon much like, though much longer than, the seasonal marathon baseball teams are put through to see which two teams will play in the World Series to decide the world championship. ¹ In such a long contest there is plenty of time for candidates to shoot themselves in the foot and find it best to leave the race, and there is plenty of time for we the people, with the aid of good, unbiased news reporters, to determine who the best candidate is.

A good news reporter is hard to find

It’s that “with the aid of good, unbiased news reporters” part that often fails us. We have to recognize that and make allowances for those reporters we think biased. It isn’t usually very hard to see which are biased and what their biases are. The ability to see through biased reporting is something that comes to some people and never seems to come to others. Usually, the more logical and mature people are the more reliable judges of the character bona fides of the various reporters covering the presidential candidates.

Life ain’t a bowl of cheers

Life isn’t easy and it is not going to change, so get used to it. Just do your very best and that will have be good enough. Even the dumbest among us knows what they want better than does the smartest, most gracious politician. That is why we decide who best represents what we want in a politician.

Related articles

• Why did Texas school district remove Rick Perry’s Islamic curriculum? (creepingsharia.wordpress.com)
• So…. Yeah… The New Smear Is That Rick Perry Is a Dhimmi, Huh? (minx.cc)
• Mitt Romney vs. Rick Perry 2012: It’s personal – Politico (news.google.com)

No related posts.

School Choice is coming soon to a School District near you

See Reason.tv video interview below featuring Dick Morse at FreedomFest 2011 in Las Vegas NV on how School Choice is gaining ground throughout the United States.

School Choice is now statewide in:

• Arizona
• Indiana
• Ohio.

It is also available in the parts of other states:

• the Memphis area of my home state, State of Tennessee
• Milwaukee area in Wisconsin
• Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
• Denver, Colorado.

If you don’t already have it, it is time for you to tell your State legislators that you want school choice in your state now.

Related posts:

1. Will the United States of America Fall Apart in July 2010?

The Founding Fathers got it right from the beginning

George Washington, and the other founding fathers of our republic, got it right from the beginning in saying the United States should mind its own business and never interfere in the internal affairs another nation. And, they said, we should never attack another nation, unless it is in our vital interests to do so, or join in the wars of other nations.

The Constitution allows Congress to grant Letters of Marque

Soon after the Continental Congress ratified the Constitution of the United States, which under Article I § 8., authorized Congress “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal… the effect of which was to give Congress the power to declare war, and grant license to private vessels and armies to attack the enemy in order to avoid or avenge injuries to the United States. Letters of Marque and Reprisal have been a part of English Common Law since 1354.

In his recent article Is Tribalism the Future?, Patrick J. Buchanan gives us an excellent analysis of why our government should never be in the business of nation building. He said this is true because we have little or no idea of the internal make up and workings of other nations; therefore, we can have no idea of the consequences that will result from our interference.

We know little to nothing of other nations, so we should quit meddling

It reasonable to say this is especially true in the case of countries in the Middle-East that have been cobbled together to suit the whims of their former colonizers. This total lack of knowledge has been manifested by the outcome of every skirmish, conflict, and out-and-out war we have engaged in, in the 20th century and so far in the 21st.

The Lord God has shown us to be meddling muddleheaded bunglers and hatemongers time and again

Consider the consequences of our joining the “great” war that was to become known as  WWI or the War to End All Wars, as it was known at the time. That war unleashed a monster on the world that arose from the ruins of its aftermath before they could be repaired or rebuilt, and before the economy of the conquered could be healed—not that the economy of the conquered was likely to be healed soon, or ever for that matter.  Such were the consequences of the damages inflicted by the allies on the conquered. Incidentally, it was France and the American Henry Morgenthau, Sr., which led the fight to make the consequences of that war as draconian, ruinous, and hateful as possible. The effect of this hatefulness was the cause of WWII.

I would add that hatefulness, which was so atypical of the America we believe in represented perhaps the most demeaning moment in American history.

Had we—the United States of America—been forced to suffer under the weight of such draconian, ruinous, and hateful damages as did the Germans after WWI, what do you think our response would have been had a politician, who acted and spoke with the mesmerizing power of a great, charismatic leader, come to us and promised:

• I will put a potato on every pot.
• I will fill your bellies.
• I will provide jobs with a living wage.
• I will cloth you with work uniforms.
• I will build roads.
• I will rebuild our factories and make them better.
• I will give you jobs that provide a living wage.

If, in keeping those promises, he:

• Provided not just one potato for every pot, but filled every pot with potatoes.
• Filled our bellies with good, nourishing, tasty food.
• Created jobs for everyone with wages that made luxuries affordable.
• Clothed us with fine garments fit for all occasions.
• Built the first national freeway system in the world.
• Rebuilt our factories and  built affordable automobiles called people’s cars.

I wonder how we would have responded? I suspect that we would have said, “Heil Hitler (or hail Obama, or whomever),” which, of course, is exactly how the Germans responded after Hitler started delivering many fold on his promises.

See why America should mind its own business?

This is just one example of how wrong headed it is for us when we join in the wars of other nations and meddle in their affairs. The most lasting legacy of WWI was WWII. Had we not joined in the fight of WWI, WWII would likely not have come to pass, and we and the world would be the richer for it. It will serve us right and show us in a good light to ourselves and to the rest of the world, if in the future we simply mind our own business henceforth. We seem to have enough trouble here at home to keep us busy for a long, long time to come. Let us get our own house in order and let others do the same.

I str0ngly suggest anyone who has read this far to read the comments that follow. Reading the comments related to this article is much more important than usual, although reading the comments is always a worthwhile thing to do.

What do you think? Agree or disagree, give the rest of us the benefit of your considered thoughts.

Related articles

• The Former American Republic (andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com)
• High Crimes (trueconservatism115.wordpress.com)
• Congress Delivered Articles of Impeachment for tyrant Obama (anationbeguiled.wordpress.com)

No related posts.

What fight? Constitutional conservatives must join the fight now to unseat President Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. or his Democrat replacement.

I was hoping against hope Obama would win

During the last presidential election I was hoping against hope Obama would win. Yes, I was a constitutional-conservative Republican then, as I am now, and have been since soon after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. As soon as it dawned on me that Lyndon Johnson would assume the presidency, I knew I could no longer be a Democrat.

The first and last time I voted for a Democrat

That election, which saw John F. Kennedy become our nation’s president, was the first election I was old enough to vote in and the last in which I voted for a Democrat. I was unable to vote in the last election; the one in which an unknown nobody, Barack Hussein Obama, become our president. The reason I was unable to vote is that I was living in the Philippines at the time and, even though I was properly registered in Orange County California as a Republican and had requested an absentee ballot in a timely manner, I did not receive a ballot for that election. And, no, it was not for lack of a good mailing address.

I used to think Georgia and some of the other states in the South—I was born and raised the South—were the best at working bureaucratic miracles. Not so. But that is a story for another time. Putting the best of all faces on the reason I did not receive an absentee ballot to vote in the last presidential election would be to say it was a California-style, bureaucratic miracle.

They took my right to vote away

In a way, I am glad someone in the Orange County election commission office saw fit not to send me a ballot for that election, because I fear I would have vote for McCain, even though I was sure that if he were elected, that would be the end of the Republican and, hence, conservative chances for national or state public office for many years to come, if not forever.

Looking back to that election and beyond, I am not so sure anymore that I want to see another Republican elected to public office.

Bill “I didn’t have sex with the girl” Clinton was the most conservative since Ronald Reagan

As disturbing and distasteful as the thought is, I believe Bill “I didn’t have sex with the girl” Clinton was the most conservative president we have had since Ronald Reagan, the all-time greatest constitutional-conservative Republican, and second greatest president ever, was in office. To simply call the other two Republicans, George “Read my lips” H. W. Bush and George “Dubya” W. Bush, economic liberals is to stretch the credulity to the breaking point. Ole “Read my lips” was an economic liberal, his son, “Dubya,” was an economic ultraliberal, and I don’t recall either of them vetoing many of the spending bills that came to their desks. Neither man cared much for constitutional niceties either, plus they were both entitlement enthusiasts. Put together, they gave us 12-years of economic liberal hell.

McCain would have been worse than the Bushes

No, the Bushes, as likeable, patriotic, and just in many of their decisions, as they were, they were not by any stretch constitutional conservatives. Sorry to say, I voted for both of them, because I saw them as the lesser of two evils.

Could John McCain be any worse than either of the Bushes? The answer is: yes. John McCain suffers from some of the same diseases that afflicts liberals. While he appears to be a cultural conservative, he appears insipid and a namby-pamby in the face of hard political and economic decisions and, like the Bushes, he is an F.D.R. New Deal-style spendthrift. And, to my knowledge, he, like Obama, has never run even the smallest business or had a job in the private sector.

Still Namby-Pamby McCain was and is a patriot

In his favor I will say John McCain service to his country as a naval aviator during the Vietnam War does recommend him and he certainly deserves our everlasting gratitude. His military service and heroism shows that at one time the man had a fire burning in his belly, but time has all but smothered that fire. Still, military service, of however much heroism, does not a president make, much less a constitutional-conservative president.

All of his experiences brought John McCain to a point in life that, had he been elected president, he might well have destroyed the Republican Party as the party of political conservatism.

We must stand up for what is right; we must join the fight now!

So where does that put us today? As I see it, unless the old guard Republicans in the House and Senate bow to the reality of the truths it has been shown by the modern-day Tea Party, the Republican Party will not win the coming presidential election. To counter that possibility, constitutional conservatives in the House and Senate must join with the Tea Party in supporting a common presidential candidate. Otherwise Obama will get his chance to finish bringing about the revolution his mentors: his father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.; Saul Alinsky, the community organizer, author of Rules for Radicals; and Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s United Church of Christ pastor for 12-years; and his other Marxist-socialists associates like Van Jones, the avowed communist; and Bill Ayers, the radical of the Weather Underground Organization faction of the Students for a Democratic Society, and professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education, have been working to bring to fruition for many years.

The time is now to join the fight for freedom and the American way

It is time. Let us join the fight now: today. We must elect a true constitutional-conservative, God-fearing president this time around, as this may be our last chance to save our God-given inalienable rights, our freedom, and the American way.

Agree or disagree?

Please favor the rest of us with your considered thoughts on this matter in comments.

Related articles

• Ed Harris Cast As John McCain In ‘Game Change’ (huffingtonpost.com)
• National Journal: McCain Tops List of Most Conservative Senators (thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com)
• McCain: U.S. should continue active role in Libya (thehill.com)
• So this is John McCain’s reward (salon.com)

Related posts:

1. The Right Change
2. Healthcare Bill Roll-Call Vote List

As some of you already know, Hillsdale College is one of the very few colleges and universities that refuses to accept any funding of any kind from the U.S. Government.

The founding Articles of Association of the Hillsdale College states it is to provide an education of a sort that will perpetuate the blessing of “civil and religious liberty and intelligent piety” of our nation.

This free offer,  which will be available for a limited time only. Styled The Constitution Reader, the  course commences with an in-depth look at the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, and continues on by covering such things as the Founders’ understanding of human nature, the rule of law and the distinctions between a tyrannical and the connection between rights and duties. These and other things pertinent to maintaining the freedoms we enjoy are covered by this free course.

The course also covers some of the other primary source documents from the time of the founding of our nation, plus it covers the constitutional crisis caused by the secession of the 1850s leading up to the War Between the States, a.k.a., the Civil War, as well as the departure from constitutional principles and practices of the Progressive Movement and that movement’s modern heirs.

Here is what Hillsdale College says about this course: In short, this Reader is collated to convey the conditions of liberty, the extent to which and manner in which those conditions have been undermined, and how they might be recovered and preserved.

All true American patriots will profit from this course.

Go to http://rushforhillsdale.com to sign up for this free course. Yes, even though I am an Imprimis subscriber, I first heard about this course today on the Rush Limbaugh Show.

Please do it now. You will be glad you did.

Related articles

• Hillsdale College Student Speaks About Conservatism (jlue.wordpress.com)
• Columbia University (jlue.wordpress.com)

Related posts:

1. Manhattan Declaration.org: Limited Time Offer

If you think Obama is destroying America, you have a lot of company

It is no longer a question of whether Obama is destroying the greatest nation the world has ever known. It has become abundantly clear that, since he has been our chief executive, he has been destroying everything America is and believes in; viz., her economy, her faith, her heritage, her culture, and her future.

Here is the question: is President Obama destroying America on purpose

I suspect he is, but I remain uncertain. Here is why. On the face of it, there are only two possibilities: either Obama is deliberately destroying America or he is a true believer in liberal progressivism. As many times as it has been discredited, to be a true believer in liberal progressivism, he would have to be a stupid fool to continue being a true believer. I think he is not stupid or a fool, so what is the answer?

I am convinced that, like Adlai Stevenson was many years ago, Mr. Obama is a very intelligent fellow.

I am not sure many of you remember Mr. Stevenson. Adlai Ewing Stevenson II (February 5, 1900 – July 14, 1965) was a politician, known for his intellectual manner, oratorical eloquence, and promotion of liberal causes of the Democrat Party. He served as the 31st Governor of Illinois. He was the Democrat Party’s presidential nominee in 1952 and 1956. He lost both those races to Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower.

While he was an eloquent orator, he was not a good extemporaneous speaker. When he spoke extemporaneously he hemmed and hawed constantly. I believe this hemming and hawing was the result of his acute intelligence, which would shower him with so many possibilities of how to deliver a given thought, as he was trying to do just that, that he was forced constantly to sift through them to find just the right words to precisely express the thought he wished to deliver.

Do you see the resemblance between Adlai Stevenson and Barack Obama? I do, I see them as very much alike.

I have been amaze over the years how often highly intelligent people arrive at very stupid conclusions. I think that may be what has lead Obama to so many absurd conclusions. His intelligence certainly lead Mr. Stevenson to many absurd conclusion.

President Obama is destroying America

My ‘Top 10 List’ of how the Obama is destroying America by over spending and under performing:

1. Debt, debt, and more debt. Unprecedented budget deficits into the foreseeable future.
2. European socialist-style spending. Spending like crazy across the board.
3. Spend, spend, spend. Billion for high-speed rail. Why? What is the ROI for the taxpayer.
4. Freezing past spending in place. Having presided over  vastly increased discretionary spending, he now wants to freeze those increases in place. This on top of the staggering discretionary spending increases of George Dubya.
5. Expanding government. He is expanding our federal government at an unprecedented pace.
6. More and higher taxes. Obama proposes $1.6 trillion in new taxes on families and businesses during the coming decade.
7. No entitlements will be reformed. Really? This despite the fact Social Security and Medicare are forecast to permanently be in the red.
8. Fake defense budget cuts. Some tiny Pentagon budget cuts actually amount to a small defense spending increases.
9. Rosy assumptions. ‘Nuff said.   Obama anticipates overly high economic growth and jobless rate.
10. Obamacare will need more money. Includes money to implement an alphabet soup of healthcare related changes and increases.

I have attenuated this list and its explanations as much as possible. Still, I think there is enough to enable you to see that President Obama is bent on destroying America as an economic powerhouse to bring us to our knees and ready us for the next step in establishing a socialist and, indeed, finally a communist America made up of 50 soviets rather than 50 sovereign states.

The other aspects of the character of the United States of America: her faith, her heritage, her culture, and her future, have been addressed and will be addressed over and over again as the fight continues to make Obama a one-term president.

Agree or disagree?

Please favor the rest of us with your considered thoughts on this matter in comments.

Related articles

• Medved: Stop Saying That Obama Wants to Destroy America (outsidethebeltway.com)
• Obama, RINOs, and the Media are Destroying America (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
• OBAMA TO THE NEXT GENERATION: SCREW YOU, SUCKERS! Hard to argue with this take, but I’m surprised … (pajamasmedia.com)

Related posts:

1. Will Obama Dismantle America Before She Wakes Up?
2. Will the United States of America Become a Socialist Country in 2010?
3. November election results will vindicate or undercut Obama